The previous entry was about intelligent design.

OK. Look.


http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&newsid=5714


If you give that a click…


Here’s what it means.


It means, the RIAA is now trying to say that it is illegal to buy a CD and put the songs on your computer or IPOD. They are basically saying you can’t copy the music off the cd in any way, shape, or form.

The recording and movie industries in this country are having serious problems with the legal idea of “fair use.” Fair use is the principle that says you are buying the rights to one copy of the art, not just the physical meduim the art is stored on.

This is in addition to thier last bullshit lawsuit – that it was illegal to copy DVDs because you had to decrypt them to do it, even though it would be legal to copy them if they weren’t encrypted. In other words, you have the right to the data, they were saying, just not to the means to move it.


Guess what? They won that lawsuit.

If they win this one, to comply with the law you will have to buy a downloaded copy of a song or album for your itunes, another for your CD player, etc.


These people have money, and they have clout, and they are scared right down to their bones of us, of our generation, of our sort. They are professional middlemen looking getting cut out of the transaction in the eye, and they are taking something away from all of us, every day, to keep it from happening. Yes, just copying CDs to your computer IS that important.

Decide where you stand on the matter of these pigs buying the law and controlling the art. Decide where you stand on the matter of these people telling your lawmakers what to do and your lawmakers blindly listening to them and their stupid ass money.


You need to write your congressperson about this. You need to tell them that the slow erosion of consumer intellectual property rights is a voting issue for you.

Man, what?

Listen: The watchmaker’s argument is horseshit.

It’s presumptous horse-shit and here’s why:

The justoposition in the argument is not the existence or complexity of the watch – it’s only its placement in the field. 


It’s an arrogant argument because the plants in the field are easily as complex as the watch.


It’s an ignorant argument because it ignores the way probability works and presumes to know the infinity of the universe.

Bad. Fucking. Argument.  

Age 6: Ninjas, Outer Space. Age 26: Ninjas, Outer Space, Boobs.

Holy shit.

People are goofy, you know?

People are just goofy.


How many great things have you passed up because of some piece of interior bullshit that kept you from operating?

I mean, just what the fuck is wrong with our software?

If you go the front of Penny Acrcade, you can check out some news about the nature of viral marketing.


This is rather like William Gibson’s recent novel Pattern Recognition.



Consider carefully that william gibson is supposed to write science fiction. Ponder it. Roll it around. Let it fuck with you a little.


Why is it when aspects of the future predicted for us by our best and brightest do arrive, they never seem to be the positive aspects… 


Well, I guess that’s enough for right now. I don’t want you little scamps to break.


Bye bye for now, and until we talk again, don’t be full of shit.


40m, -11